The Supreme Court has delivered a landmark judgement in the Ayodhya land dispute case that will have far-reaching effects in India. The team of five-judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Mr. Ranjan Gogoi read out a unanimous judgement and ruled in favor of the Ram Janma bhoomi Ayodhya and said there will be Ram Mandir at the disputed site and Sunni Muslims will be given an alternate 5 acre land for their mosque in Ayodhya.
Earlier, The Supreme Court heard the long-pending Ayodhya land dispute case for a period of 40 days at a stretch and pronounced the historic verdict and according to Archaeological History on Saturday as the nation waited with bated breathe.
Here are the most 10 key takeaways from the landmark judgement in the Ayodhya verdict case:
1. The Supreme Court has granted the entire 2.77 acre of disputed land in Ayodhya to deity Ram Lalla Temple result.
2. As announced, Supreme Court has directed the Centre government and Uttar Pradesh government to allot an alternative 5 acre land to the Muslims at a prominent place to build a mosque in Ayodhya.
3. The Supreme court has asked Centre to consider granting some kind of representation to Nirmohi Akhara in setting up of trust. Nirmohi Akhara was the third party in the Ayodhya dispute case.
4. The Supreme Court has dismissed the plea of Nirmohi Akhara, which was seeking control of the entire disputed land, saying they are the custodian of the land in Ayodhya.
5. Supreme Court has directed the Union government to set up a trust in 3 months for the construction of the Ram mandir at the disputed site in ayodhya where Babri Masjid was demolished in 1992.
6. The Supreme Court said the underlying structure below the disputed site at Ayodhya was not an Islamic structure, but the ASI has not established whether a temple was demolished to build a mosque.
7. The court also said that the Hindus consider the disputed site as the birthplace of Lord Ram while the Muslims also say the same about the Babri Masjid mosque.
8. The court also said that the faith of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the disputed site where the Babri Masjid once stood cannot be disputed.
9. The Supreme Court also announced that the 1992 demolition of the 16th century Babri Masjid was a violation of law in India.
10. Finally its judgment, the Supreme Court said that the Uttar Pradesh’s Sunni Central Waqf Board has failed to establish its case in Ayodhya dispute case and Hindus have established their case that they were in possession of outer courtyard of the disputed site.